Supreme Court Hears Brief About Florida’s Death Penalty

Electric Chair

Earlier this month, the American Bar Association filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn Florida’s law that allows juries to recommend the death penalty by a majority vote.

According to the American Bar Association Journal, “The U.S. Supreme Court appeal concerns the case of Timothy Lee Hurst, a man his lawyers say has limited mental abilities […] At issue is a majority jury vote recommending that Hurst should get the death penalty in the brutal 1998 slaying of an assistant manager at the fast-food restaurant where both he and she were employed.” Hurst’s legal counsel claims that Florida’s unique sentencing procedure in death penalty cases violates not only his Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury but the Eight Amendment prevention of cruel and unusual punishment.

Florida’s death penalty law is different from any other state in that it does not require a unanimous jury vote in order to recommend the maximum punishment at sentencing. Crimes currently punishable by death in Florida include but are not limited to capital drug trafficking, felony-murder, and first-degree murder. Florida was the first state to reintroduce the death penalty after the Supreme Court struck down all statutes countrywide in 1972 after Furman v. Georgia, and remains controversial for having the second largest death row in the country (Texas has the largest).

In its argument summary, the ABA states, “Unique among all capital punishment jurisdictions in the United States, Florida is the only jurisdiction that allows a jury to determine by majority vote both whether aggravating circumstances have been proved beyond a reasonable double and to recommend a sentence of death.” It will be up the Supreme Court to determine whether this jurisdictional distinction violates both the Sixth and Eighth Amendments.

Explains Miami-based legal analyst Kendall Coffey, “We have a love-hate relationship with the death penalty. We see these despicable crimes; we want the maximum punishment applied to people who brutally kill children or to terrorists,” of how capital punishment can help create closure for those affected by unspeakable crimes. He continues, “At the same time we’re very concerned about mistakes being made, both mistakes with respect to selecting who is worthy of dying, if anyone, and mistakes with respect to the actual administration of execution. And these kind of cases, where horrible pains and horrible mistreatment occurs in the course of an execution, are very troubling to Americans and obviously of great concern to the United States Supreme Court.”

In short, there is no easy approach when it comes to the death penalty, especially in Florida where there is already so much controversy surrounding the state’s distinctive majority vote law. As the Supreme Court examines the role of juries and judges in sentencing for capital cases, hopefully more conclusive answers will be reached about how to proceed with sentencing offenders.


Further reading pertaining to capital punishment in Florida:

Brief of Americus Curiae American Bar Association in Support of Petitioner (Timothy Lee Hurst) – ABA Amicus Brief PDF

“ABA asks SCOTUS to overturn Florida law allowing divided juries to recommend death penalty” – ABA Journal article by Martha Neil

“SCOTUS to consider brief related to FL death penalty” – In-depth article by April Warren of the Ocala Star Banner